3.1. Structural and dynamical properties
has a trigonal structure with space group
(#164), and with a symmetry of
, α =β = 9, and γ = 12°. Wyckoff position 1b is for Sr and 2d position for both Mg and X (N, P, As, Sb, and Bi). The lattice parameters a (in unit Å), c (Å), c/a ratio, bulk modulus B (GPa), pressure derivative (
, ground state volume, and energy are obtained by unit cell volume optimization of
compounds. The specimen crystal structure is shown in Fig. 1, while the ground state structural optimization (E–V) curves of all understudy compounds are shown in Fig. 2. The minimum of these parabolic curves corresponds to the lowest ground state energy at the optimum volumes of the unit cell.[16] The calculated ground state structural parameters (lattice constant, bulk modulus, volume, energy) are summarized in Table 1 along with the previous experimental and theoretical data for comparison. The results of our calculations are in agreement with those validated by the previous experimental and theoretical data. As a general trend, the lattice constants (a (Å) and c (Å)) increase as those move down in the periodic table for insertion of anion from N to Bi. Bulk modulus B (GPa) decreases as one move from as we move down the group-V, showing the more compressibility trend and lowering in the hardness of these materials.
Table 1.
Table 1.
Table 1.
The lattice parameters a, c, c/a ratio, the bulk modulus B, optimum volume
, and ground state total energy
.
.
Compound |
a/Å |
c/Å |
c/a
|
V0/a.u.3
|
B/GPa |
E0/Ry |
SrMg2N2
|
3.65 |
6.362 |
1.74 |
496.57 |
94.80 |
−7380.33 |
|
3.622,[3] 3.624,[3] 3.6292[5] |
6.359,[3] 6.346,[3] 6.3421[5] |
|
|
|
|
SrMg2P2
|
4.37 |
7.240 |
1.65 |
809.08 |
53.03 |
−8529.75 |
|
SrMg2As2
|
4.43 |
7.456 |
1.68 |
859.39 |
48.65 |
−16205.76 |
|
4.41[6] |
7.41[6] |
1.68[8] |
|
|
|
SrMg2Sb2
|
4.74 |
7.879 |
1.66 |
1037.64 |
40.23 |
−33095.85 |
|
4.70[6] |
7.83[6] |
1.66[8] |
|
|
|
SrMg2Bi2
|
4.81 |
8.146 |
1.69 |
1102.32 |
34.71 |
−93487.30 |
|
4.79[6] |
7.93[6] |
1.66[8] |
|
|
|
Refs. [3] and [8]: experimental results; Refs. [5] and [6]: theoretical results.
| Table 1.
The lattice parameters a, c, c/a ratio, the bulk modulus B, optimum volume
, and ground state total energy
.
. |
Variations in the structural parameters with insertion of group-V light to heavy elements probe the electronic and optical properties that in turn depend on the vibrational behavior. A real frequency vibrational response guarantees the dynamical stability of the materials. Therefore, the phonon dispersion calculations are important to investigate the dynamics under the electronic and optical processes. Calculated phonon dispersions are shown in Fig. 3. All compounds have shown stable dynamical behavior with gamma centered longitudinal response having no imaginary frequencies. The general trend of a decrease in the frequencies of the optical modes can be understood as the heavier anion insertion reduces the bulk modulus and elasticity of these compounds. The general trend of the hard to soft optical phonon frequencies also shows the gradual weakening of the bonding while going down the group-V. No imaginary frequencies in all understudied systems confirm the dynamical stability of these materials.
3.2. Electronic propertiesOwing to the ground state stable configurations, band structures of
, (X=N, P, As, Sb, Bi) are calculated using state of the art TB-mBJ exchange–correlation functional. The conduction band minima (CBM) of
(X =As, Sb) lies at the M symmetry point and valence band maxima (VBM) lies at the Γ symmetry point, therefore both compounds are indirect band gap along the
direction, while the direct band gap of
(X = Bi, N, and P) lies at the Γ symmetry point. Our calculation is still in good agreement with the recent published work.[5–7] In all the cases, N-containing cases yielded the highest band gap up to 3.20 eV at a given pnictogen group. The band gap decreases as the pnictogen anions goes down the periodic table from N to P (1.27 eV), then increases for As up to 1.93 eV, again decreasing for Sb up to 1.56 eV, and a sharp decrease in a band gap value up to 0.42 eV for Bi.
Total density of states (TDOS) and partial density of states (PDOS) plots of
compounds are shown in Fig. 4. TB-mBJ functional calculations of the TDOS as well as PDOS are employed to find out the contribution of the electronic states to charge carriers near the Fermi level. In our calculations, we set the Fermi level to the maximum of the valence band and the states with high contribution are plotted for clarity. Contribution to the valence band occupied states is dominated by the anion p-state, while the cation (Sr) s-state has very little and suppressed contribution. The minimum of the conduction band is contributed mainly by the cation (Sr) d-state. The cation–anion contribution of states to the valence and conduction band follows the same pattern for all of these ionic systems. Hence, the exciton structure of these systems will be mainly constituted by a combination of the anion p-state holes carriers and electrons carriers in the d-state of cation (Sr).
3.4. Optical properties
(X=N, P, Bi) are direct band gap materials, and these materials might be promising solar cell absorbents. To investigate the possibility, we have calculated the important optical properties like complex dielectric function, reflectivity, complex refractive index, reflectivity and optical conductivity of the understudied materials, and the results are shown in Figs. 6 and 7. The figures show the average optical spectra and not the diagonal components. The anisotropy of the crystals is observed through the birefringence, which is shown in Fig. 8.
The real and imaginary parts are given in Fig. 6(a) and 6(b), which identify the optical dielectric response function for
compounds in the energy range of 0 eV to 10 eV. Also, the maximum values for real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function are determined. It is clearly seen from the figures that the static dielectric function
increases from SrMg2N2 to SrMg2Bi2 as expected, while the energy band gap decreases. This inverse feature could be associated with Pennʼs model.[17] For SrMg2N2, the sharp peak of
noted to be 7.08 at energy 3.85 eV. Similarly, for SrMg2P2 the sharp peak of
noted to be 12.38 at energy 3.11 eV. In the same way,
for SrMg2As2, SrMg2Sb2, and SrMg2Bi2 compounds are noted to be 13.71, 16.97, and 20.98 at energy points 3.03, 2.68, and 2.08 eV, respectively. Except SrMg2N2, whose energy values lie in the ultraviolet spectrum, all the other four compounds have peaks in the visible region of a spectrum. In Fig. 6(b), we display the imaginary part of the optical dielectric function as a function of energy
, which is the sum of total ground state transitions from the occupied states of the VB to the unoccupied states CB. This spectrum starts from the fundamental transition edge, which is the excitation of electron from the maximum of valence band to the minimum of the conduction band exhibiting the agreement with the band gap of the materials. This fundamental transition is called the threshold point beyond which the curve increases sharply due to the large interband transitions. Large interband transition incorporates more electrons as the energy of the incident photons increase and hence more optical absorption. Being a narrow band gap material, SrMg2Bi2 showed large absorption covering the entire visible region together with the near ultraviolet photons. Hence the stable and UV-Vis absorbent SrMg2Bi2 is a potential candidate for solar cell technology. The SrMg2N2 has a wide gap (3.20 eV), which cannot accumulate the visible spectrum and show absorption in the ultraviolet region. On the other hand, SrMg2P2 is a medium gap material showing the absorption in part of the visible region and extending to the ultraviolet photons. Collectively, the family of semiconductors
(X=N, P, As, Sb, and Bi) are potential candidates for the solar cells accumulating the visible to ultraviolet energy spectrum. The maximum absorption peaks in the spectra are situated at 5.98, 12.54, 12.59, 16.45, and 22.60 for 8.28, 4.83, 5.31, 4.14, and 2.73 eV for
, respectively.
Reflectivity of a compound provides information to the surface of the material. In Fig. 7, non-zero components of the optical reflectivity coefficient
values are 0.12, 0.19, 0.20, 0.23, and 0.32 for SrMg2N2, SrMg2P2, SrMg2As2, SrMg2Sb2, and SrMg2Bi2, respectively, which correspond to reflection at 0 eV. After the limit of zero frequency, reflectivity coefficient
enhances with increasing incident photon frequency. Reflectivity maximum arises from the inter band transitions. The figure indicates the prominent reflectance of
(X=N, P, As, Sb, Bi). For SrMg2N2, the maximum reflectivity is noted to be 0.33 at 9.23 eV. Similarly, for SrMg2P2, SrMg2As2, SrMg2Sb2, and SrMg2Bi2, the maximum reflectivity was found to be 0.54, 0.56, 0.59, and 0.64 at energy 6.95, 6.81, 5.45, and 5.64 eV, respectively.
The optical conductivity spectrum δ (ω) is shown in Fig. 7(b). The photoconductivity is an optical phenomenon in which electrical conductivity of a material increases due to the absorption of electromagnetic radiation. This spectrum represents the conduction of electrons when applying electromagnetic field. It refers to the conductivity of a material which is created by electron transportation due to photon radiation. The maximum value of δ (ω) is found to be 6669, 8162, 9055, 9235, and 8412
around 8.3, 4.8, 5.3, 4.2, and 2.8 eV for SrMg2N2, SrMg2P2, SrMg2As2, SrMg2Sb2, and SrMg2Bi2, respectively. Investigations of this quantity help us to offer new optoelectronic applications for electro-optical devices.
The static refractive index n(0) is obtained in Fig. 7(c), and these results are found to be 2.08, 2.57, 2.67, 2.88, and 3.63 for SrMg2N2, SrMg2P2, SrMg2As2, SrMg2Sb2, and SrMg2Bi2, respectively. These results show that n(0) increases as we move from SrMg2N2 to SrMg2Bi2. The imaginary part of the refractive index or extinction coefficient K(ω) spectrum as a function of the incident photons shows the absorption behavior and closely follows the interband transition of
spectra. The local maxima of K(ω) corresponding to the zero values of
as shown in Fig. 6(b), are found to be 1.63 at 8.44 eV for SrMg2N2, 2.63 at 6.02 eV for SrMg2P2, 2.67 at 5.53 eV for SrMg2As2, 3.03 at 4.66 eV for SrMg2Sb2, and 2.96 at 3.82 eV for SrMg2Bi2, respectively. The K(ω), as plotted in Fig. 7(d) has a similar trend to
, which indicates absorption of the incident electromagnetic energy.
The birefringence is the difference between the extraordinary and ordinary refraction indices,
–
, where
is the index of refraction for an electric field oriented along the c axis and
is the index of refraction for an electric field perpendicular to the c axis. Figure 8 shows the spectral behavior of the birefringence
for
compounds. The presence of birefringence is actually in the nonabsorbing region, which is below the energy gap and contributing to the nonlinear optical behavior. The
spectral dependence shows strong oscillations around zero in the energy range up to 10 eV.